REFERENCE · §5 · LAST REVIEWED 2026-04-27

ACF §5Vendor Due Diligence

Vendor due diligence for agent stacks extends traditional third-party risk assessment to cover foundation-model providers (Anthropic, OpenAI, Google), MCP server operators, agentic-harness authors, and individual tool publishers — each carrying distinct risk that conventional vendor questionnaires miss.

A regulated firm’s third-party risk programme typically covers SaaS vendors and core service providers. Agent stacks introduce new categories: a foundation model provider whose update cadence may shift behaviour without notice; MCP servers offering tools the agent can call; community-published tools whose authors may be unknown. Each requires bespoke due diligence: model provenance, training-data assertions, change-management commitments, MCP-server identity verification, and tool-author trust scoring. Maps to FCA SYSC 8 outsourcing, DORA TPP requirements, EBA outsourcing guidelines.

Regulatory anchors

What this covers

Common gaps

Related sections


Take action

Score your firm's readiness across all twelve dimensions with the Agent Compliance Scorecard →

Reference compiled by Sebastian Heine. Editorial perspective at The SHeine Brief.